![]() In a subsequent discussion of the film with Joseph Gelmis, Kubrick said his main aim was to avoid "intellectual verbalization" and reach "the viewer's subconscious". Yet there is at least one logical structure-and sometimes more than one-behind everything that happens on the screen in "2001", and the ending does not consist of random enigmas, some critics to the contrary. What I meant was, of course, that because we were dealing with the mystery of the universe, and with powers and forces greater than man's comprehension, then by definition they could not be totally understandable. I still stand by this remark, which does not mean one can't enjoy the movie completely the first time around. The very nature of the visual experience in 2001 is to give the viewer an instantaneous, visceral reaction that does not-and should not-require further amplification." When told that Kubrick had called his comment 'facetious', Clarke responded Neither of the two creators equated openness to interpretation with meaninglessness, although it might seem that Clarke implied as much when he stated, shortly after the film's release, "If anyone understands it on the first viewing, we've failed in our intention." When told of the comment, Kubrick said "I believe he made it facetiously. You're free to speculate as you wish about the philosophical and allegorical meaning of the film-and such speculation is one indication that it has succeeded in gripping the audience at a deep level-but I don't want to spell out a verbal road map for 2001 that every viewer will feel obligated to pursue or else fear he's missed the point. In a 1968 interview with Playboy, Kubrick stated: Kubrick encouraged people to explore their own interpretations of the film, and refused to explain "what really happened" in the movie, preferring instead to let audiences embrace their own ideas and theories. ![]() ![]() Nonetheless, in July 2018, Kubrick's interpretation of the ending scene was presented after being newly found in an early interview. Clarke, wanted to leave the film open to philosophical and allegorical interpretation, purposely presenting the final sequences of the film without the underlying thread being apparent a concept illustrated by the final shot of the film, which contains the image of the embryonic "Starchild". The director of the film, Stanley Kubrick, and the writer, Arthur C. Since its premiere in 1968, the film 2001: A Space Odyssey has been analysed and interpreted by numerous people, ranging from professional movie critics to amateur writers and science fiction fans. Academic analyses of 2001: A Space Odyssey
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |